Potreros, cultivos e desigualdad. Cuestionar la relación inversa entre el tamaño y la productividad de fincas en Colombia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
The Colombian countryside has long been dominated by grass and inequality. Economic theory (i.e., the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity) holds that the monopolization of land by ranchers is irrational since farming is more productive than ranching and small farms often produce more per area than large ones. Traditional explanations for the predominance of grass and the country’s agrarian structure focus on extra-economic coercion and the status associated with owning land and cattle. By contrast, this study explores the relative profitability of ranching and the limitations of peasant agriculture, which generated contrasting capacities to accumulate. It thus suggests that land markets, and the productive advantages of cattle, offer an alternative explanation.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Obra disponívelem acceso aberto bajo licença Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
Referências
Ali, D. A. & K. Deininger (2015). Is there a farm size-productivity relationship in African agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda. Land Economics, 91(2), 317-343.
Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587-612.
Archer, R. P. (1990). The transition from traditional to broker clientelism in Colombia: Political stability and social unrest (Working Paper, 140). Notre Dame, IN: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
Atkinson, L. J. (1970). Agricultural productivity in Colombia, Foreign Agricultural Economic Report, 66. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Baines, S. & Steen, D. R. (1971). Farm firm level analysis. Colombia agricultural sector analysis (Working Document Series No.17). U.S. Agency for International Development.
Balcázar, A. (1994). La ganadería en la Amazonia. ¿Instrumento de consolidación del colono? Coyuntura Colombiana, 11(1), 133-144.
Bardhan, P. K. (1973). Size, productivity, and returns to scale: An analysis of farm-level data in Indian agriculture. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(6), 1370-1386.
Barraclough, S. (1973). Agrarian structure in Latin America: A resumé of the CIDA land tenure studies of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Berry, A. & Cline, W. R. (1979). Agrarian structure and productivity in developing countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bhalla, S. S. & Roy, P. (1988). Mis-specification in farm productivity analysis: The role of land quality”. Oxford Economic Papers (New Series), 40(1), 55-73.
Byres, T. (2004). Introduction: Contextualizing and interrogating the GKI case for redistributive land reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1-2), 1-16.
Caja de Crédito Agrario Industrial y Minero (1955). Producción nacional: Estudio sobre los principales aspectos del desarrollo de la producción agropecuaria. Bogotá: Caja de Crédito Agrario Industrial y Minero.
Caja de Crédito Agrario Industrial y Minero (1966). Informe de gerencia. (31 de diciembre de 1966). Bogotá: Caja de Crédito Agrario Industrial y Minero
Cespedes, L. (1979). Diagnóstico sobre la producción y mercadeo de maíz en Colombia (undergraduate thesis). Bogotá: Universidad Externado.
CIAT (1975). Cassava Production Systems. Cali: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.
CIDA (1966). Tenencia de la tierra y desarrollo socio-económico del sector agrícola: Colombia. Washington, D.C.: Organización de los Estados Americanos.
Cornia, G. A. (1985). Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Development, 13(4), 513-534.
Crist, R. E. (1952). The Cauca Valley, Colombia: Land tenure and land use. Baltimore: The Waverly Press.
CVC (1962). Analisis económico de 109 fincas en el área del proyecto Roldanillo-La Unión-Toro, 1961-1962. Cali: Corporación Autónoma Regional del Cauca.
DANE (1964). Directorio nacional de exploitaciones agropecuario (censo agropecuario) 1960: Resúmen nacional. Bogotá: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística.
Dávila Tello, J. V. (1949). Economía agropecuario de Colombia, 1948. Bogotá: Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería.
Denevan, W. (1982). Causes of deforestation and forest and woodland degradation in tropical Latin America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
Dyer, G. (2004). Redistributive land reform: No April rose. The poverty of Berry and Cline and GKI on the inverse relationship. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1-2), 45-72.
Economic Commission for Latin America (1957). Analyses and projections of economic development III. The economic development of Colombia. Geneva: United Nations.
Fals Borda, O. (1976). Capitalismo, hacienda y poblamiento: Su desarrollo en la costa atlántica. Bogotá: Punta de Lanza.
Fals Borda, O. (2002). Historia doble de la costa (vols. 1-4). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Banco de la República, and El Áncora Editores.
FEDEGAN (1971). La rentabilidad ganadera en el país. Trabajo presentado a la VII Conferencia Consultiva de Ganaderos, Cúcuta, Mayo 27-29 de 1971. FEDEGAN.
Flórez, R. (1926).Fases de Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Minerva.
Gaitán, G. (1984). La lucha por la tierra en la década del treinta: Génesis de la organización sindical campesina. Bogotá: El Áncora Editores.
Grajales, J. (2011). The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 771-792.
Griffin, E. (1973). Testing the von Thunen Theory in Uruguay. Geographical Review, 63(4), 500-516.
Griffin, K., Khan, A. R., & Ickowitz, A. (2002). Poverty and the distribution of land. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2(3), 279-330.
Griffin, K., Khan, A. R., & Ickowitz, A. (2004). In defence of neo-classical neo-populism. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 361-386.
Grunig, J. E. (1968). Information, entrepreneurship, and economic development: A study of the decisionmaking process of Colombian latifundistas (doctoral dissertation). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Grupo de Memória Histórica (Comisión Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación) (2010). La tierra en disputa. Memorias de despojo y resistencia campesina en la costa Caribe (1960-2010). Bogotá: Taurus. 2010.
Guerra, G. E. (1966). Economic aspects for corn and milo in Colombia. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía & Instituto Forestal.
Haney, E. (1971). Possibilities for the economic reorganization of minifundia in a highland region of Colombia (Research Paper No. 43). Land Tenure Center, Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Havens, A. E., Montero, E., & Romieux, M. (1965). Cereté: Un área de latifundio. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The future of small farms: Trajectories and policy priorities. World Development, 38(10), 1349-1361.
Henderson, J. D. (1985). When Colombia bled: A history of the Violencia in Tolima. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1963). Journeys toward progress; Studies of economic policymaking in Latin America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Humphries, S. (1998). Milk cows, migrants, and land markets: Unraveling the complexities of forest-to-pasture conversion in northern Honduras. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(1), 95-124.
IBRD (1950). The basis of a development program for Colombia. Washington, D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
ILMA (1964). Supply problems of basic agricultural products in Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto Latinoamericano de Mercadeo Agrícola.
Kalmanovitz, S. (1989). El régimen agrario durante el siglo XIX. In A. Tirado, J. Jaramillo & J. O. Melo (Eds.), Nueva Historia de Colombia, vol. 2 .Era Republicana) (pp. 101-154). Bogotá: Planeta.
Kimhi, A. (2006). Plot size and maize productivity in Zambia: Is there an inverse relationship. Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 1-9.
Lamb, R. (2003). Inverse productivity: Land quality, labor markets, and measurement error. Journal of Development Economics, 71(1), 71-95.
LeGrand, C. (1986). Frontier expansion and peasant protest in Colombia, 1850-1936. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Londoño, D. R. (1975). Economic analysis of subsistence agriculture in Garcia Rovira, Colombia (doctoral dissertation). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
López, A. (1927). Problemas colombianos. Paris: Editorial París-América.
Martz, J. D. (1997). The politics of clientelism: Democracy and the state in Colombia. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Masterson, T. (2007). Productivity, technical efficiency, and farm size in Paraguayan agriculture (Working Paper No. 490). Annandale-On-Hudson, NY: The Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.
Molano, A. (1994). Algunas consideraciones sobre colonización y violencia. In A. Machado (Ed.), El agro y la cuestión social (pp. 27-41). Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores, Banco Ganadero, Caja Agraria, VECOL.
Molano, A. (1996). Selva adentro: Una historia oral de la colonización del Guaviare. Bogotá: El Áncora Editores.
Ocampo, G. I. (1988). Hacienda y campesinos en el Sinú. Formas de vida y formas de trabajo en ‘Marta Magdalena’ (1912-1954). Boletín Museo del Oro, 20, 112-129.
Ocampo, G. I. (2007). La instauración de la ganadería en el valle del Sinú. La hacienda Marta Magdalena, 1881-1956. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia and Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.
Oquist, P. (1980). Violence, Conflict, and Politics in Colombia. New York: Academic Press.
Palacios, M. (2011). ¿De quién es la tierra. Propiedad, politización y protesta campesina en la década de 1930. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Posada Carbó, E. (1996). The Colombian Caribbean: A regional history, 1870-1950. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Randell, C. G. (1953). La Industria Ganadera en Colombia. Washington, D.C.
Reyes, A. (1978). Latifundio y poder político: La hacienda ganadera en Sucre. Bogotá: Editorial CINEP.
Reyes, A. (1986). Entrevista con James Parsons. Estudios Sociales (Medellín),1, 199-211.
Reyes, A. & Duica, L. (2009). Guerreros y campesinos. El despojo de la tierra en Colombia. Bogotá: Norma.
Richards, A. (1979). The political economy of gutswirtschaft: A comparative analysis of East Elbian Germany, Egypt, and Chile. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 21(4), 483-518.
Schultz, T. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shane, D. (1986). Hoofprints on the Forest. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
Smith, T. L. (1969). Agricultural-pastoral conflict: A major obstacle in the process of rural development. Journal of Inter-American Studies, 11(1), 16-43.
Taussig, M. (1974). Rural proletarianization; a social and historical enquiry into the commercialization of the southern Cauca Valley, Colombia (doctoral dissertation). London: The University of London.
Taussig, M. (1978). Peasant economics and the development of capitalist agriculture in the Cauca Valley, Colombia. Latin American Perspectives, 5(3) 62-91.
Thirsk, W. R. (1972). The economics of Colombian farm mechanization (doctoral dissertation). New Haven: Yale University.
Trant, G. I. (1958). Implications of calculated economic optima in the Cauca Valley, Colombia, S. A. Journal of Farm Economics, 40(1), 123-132.
Tucker, R. P. (2000). Insatiable Appetite: The United States and the Ecological Degradation of the Tropical World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
United Nations (1962). Livestock in Latin America; Status, Problems and Prospects. I. Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela. New York: United Nations.
United States Department of Commerce (1975). Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
Unal, F. G. (2008). Small is beautiful: Evidence of an inverse relationship between farm size and yield in Turkey (Working Paper No. 551). Annandale-On-Hudson, NY: The Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.
Van Ausdal, S. (2009a). Pasture, power, and profit: An environmental history of cattle ranching in Colombia, 1850-1950. Geoforum, 40(5), 707-719.
Van Ausdal, S. (2009b). The logic of livestock: An historical geography of cattle ranching in Colombia, 1850-1950 (doctoral dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.
Van Ausdal, S. (2012). Productivity gains and the limits of tropical ranching in Colombia, 1850-1950. Agricultural History, 86(3), 1-32.
Van Ausdal, S. (2016). Reimagining the tropical beef frontier and the nation in early twentieth century Colombia. In G. Winder and A. Dix (Eds.), Trading Environments: Frontiers, Commercial Knowledge and Environmental Transformation, 1820-1990 (pp. 166-192). London: Routledge.
Wiggins, S., Kirsten, J., & Llambí, L. (2010). The future of small farms. World Development, 38(10), 1341-1348.
Wood, R. H., Jr. (1966). The base economy of Tolú (master’s thesis). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Wooten, H. H. (1953). Major uses of land in the United States (Technical Bulletin No. 1082). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Wylie, K. (1942). The agriculture of Colombia (Foreign Agriculture Bulletin No. 1). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Yepes, F. (2001). Ganadería y transformación de ecosistemas: un análisis ambiental de la política de apropiación territorial. In G. Palacio (Ed.), Naturaleza en disputa: ensayos de historia ambiental de Colombia, 1850-1995 (pp. 117-172). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.
Zamosc, L. (1986). The agrarian question and the peasant movement in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zapata Olivella, M. (1947). Tierra Mojada. Bogotá: Ediciones